Penilaian Kondisi Perkerasan Jalan dengan Metode Indeks Kondisi Perkerasan (IKP) pada Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, Kota Batang

Sandhika Sujayanto; Mohammad Hatta Keitaro; Suprapto Hadi

doi:10.51988/jtsc.v7i4.768

Authors

Sandhika Sujayanto Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan
Mohammad Hatta Keitaro Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan
Suprapto Hadi Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51988/jtsc.v7i4.768

Keywords:

Pavement Condition Index, Pavement Distress, Flexible Pavement, Pd 01-2016-B, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman

Abstract

Jalan Jenderal Sudirman, Kota Batang, is part of the Java North Coast (Pantura) corridor, a primary arterial used by heavy vehicles, but the studies reviewed here did not report the surface condition of a comparable flexible-pavement section assessed with the Pavement Condition Index (IKP). This study determines the IKP, the dominant distresses, the location of damaged segments, and the required treatment on a 1-km section. A visual survey was carried out on 10 October 2026 on 80 sample units (50 m each, 40 per direction) following Guideline Pd 01-2016-B, and differences between directions and lanes were tested with the Mann-Whitney test. The pavement is in Very Good condition overall (IKP 86.9), but the damage is concentrated in specific segments rather than spread evenly: 12 of the 80 units (15%) are in the Fair or Poor classes, and station 0+550–0+600 is among the worst in both directions. Alligator cracking is the dominant distress, and no high-severity distress was found. The westbound IKP (84.9) and the eastbound IKP (88.5) do not differ significantly (p = 0.27), nor do the two lanes. Most of the section needs only routine or periodic maintenance, while three westbound units require reconstruction or recycling. The results give a baseline for monitoring this corridor and for focusing maintenance on the damaged segments.

References

[1] H. W. Husaini and T. Junoasmono, “Peran infrastruktur jalan Pantura Jawa dalam rangka mendukung peningkatan ekonomi nasional,” Jurnal HPJI, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.26593/jh.v3i1.2435.

[2] Pemerintah Kabupaten Batang, “Warga Batang dukung penuh pembatasan truk sumbu 3 secara konsisten,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://berita.batangkab.go.id/?p=1&id=14939. Accessed: Oct. 2026.

[3] Tribun Jateng, “Breaking news truk tronton bermuatan veneer terguling di Pantura Batang, muatan tumpah ke jurang,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://jateng.tribunnews.com/jawa-tengah/1262594/breaking-news-truk-tronton-bermuatan-veneer-terguling-di-pantura-batang-muatan-tumpah-ke-jurang. Accessed: Oct. 2026.

[4] R. F. Dhiaulhaq and M. Fauzan, “Evaluasi kerusakan lapis perkerasan jalan dengan metode Pavement Condition Index (PCI),” Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2022, doi: 10.29244/jsil.7.2.161-170.

[5] A. Armahedi and E. Mulyati, “Assessment of pavement performance using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI): A case study of the Bengrah II Project in Palembang, Indonesia,” Civil and Sustainable Urban Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 117–129, 2025, doi: 10.53623/csue.v5i2.831.

[6] A. Y?lmaz and E. Karabay, “Empirical modeling of Pavement Condition Index (PCI) based on traffic volume and heavy-vehicle composition,” Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 20, Art. no. 10458, 2026, doi: 10.3390/su182010458.

[7] I. A. Rajak, I. Altarans, and F. Faruk, “Flexible pavement distress analysis using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method,” SCIENTIA: Journal of Multi Disciplinary Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 90–107, 2026, doi: 10.62394/scientia.v4i2.261.

[8] Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, “Penentuan Indeks Kondisi Perkerasan (IKP),” Pd 01-2016-B, Surat Edaran Menteri PUPR No. 19/SE/M/2016, Jakarta, Indonesia, Oct. 11, 2016.

[9] F. Z. Hibatullah, A. A. R. Wardana, and L. Aisyah, “Pengelolaan jalan berdasarkan metode IKP dan IRI (studi kasus Jalan Jenderal Sudirman STA 2+000–STA 3+400 Kota Bandung),” RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2025.

[10] I. R. Rame, I. G. U. H. Sutrisna, and A. Hidayatulloh, “Analisis kerusakan jalan menggunakan Indeks Kondisi Perkerasan (IKP) (studi kasus: Jalan Terong Tawah Labu Api),” Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1045–1048, 2025, doi: 10.29303/geoscienceed.v6i2.908.

[11] E. Saputra, A. Parianta, Lukman, and M. O. Mahendra, “Strategi pemeliharaan dan model hubungan antara nilai kekasaran jalan dan nilai kondisi perkerasan kaku dengan metode IKP dan IRI: studi kasus Jalan Lingkar Selatan Kota Cilegon,” Structure Teknik Sipil, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 24–31, 2025.

[12] A. Setiawan, D. Afriyanti, and R. D. Febriana, “Model hubungan antara kerusakan jalan dan kecepatan kendaraan di jalan perkotaan,” Jurnal HPJI, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 75–84, 2024.

[13] A. Suraji, E. G. Jati, and M. Cakrawala, “Analisis kerusakan jalan menggunakan metode IKP (Indeks Kondisi Perkerasan),” Teras Jurnal: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 410–423, 2026, doi: 10.29103/tj.v16i2.1403.

[14] N. Nefrida and M. N. Bani, “Analisis kondisi kerusakan jalan pada ruas jalan Badas–Kunjang Kabupaten Kediri berdasarkan metode Bina Marga,” Jurnal Online Skripsi Manajemen Rekayasa Konstruksi (JOS-MRK), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 217–222, 2025, doi: 10.33795/jos-mrk.v6i3.8114.

[15] A. Pratama and A. M. Kurniawan, “Evaluasi kerusakan jalan berdasarkan metode Bina Marga pada Jl Raya Condong Probolinggo,” Jurnal Online Skripsi Manajemen Rekayasa Konstruksi (JOS-MRK), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 223–228, 2025, doi: 10.33795/jos-mrk.v6i3.8115.

[16] N. H. Imani, “Penentuan prioritas penanganan kerusakan jalan berdasarkan Indeks Kondisi Perkerasan (IKP) di Kota Putussibau,” Wahana Teknik Sipil, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2026, doi: 10.32497/wahanats.v31i1.6896.

[17] D. Bangguna, Y. Lawodi, E. Bansambua, H. Abulebu, and E. Pandoyu, “Penilaian kondisi perkerasan jalan menggunakan metode Bina Marga dan PCI untuk menentukan prioritas penanganan kerusakan,” Jurnal Konstruksi, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2026, doi: 10.33364/konstruksi/v.24-1.2909.